Monthly Archives: February 2015

Let’s Purvey Let’s Plays

Let’s Purvey Let’s Plays

That title was almost clever!  Anywho, gaming has been going from strength to strength in recent years, and it’d be foolish not to attribute that to let’s plays, at least in some small part. We’ve all seen them, in fact I’d wager anyone tech savvy enough to come across this blog has seen a fair few. Many of us love them, myself included. I even do them with a close friend as a hobby, so I appreciate that I’m hardly impartial on this whole matter.

Critics of Youtube personalities regularly raise concerns that “it’s not a real job” or “it’s just being payed to play video games” as well as “Let’s Players are parasites”. Let me explain why I believe they’re wrong.

At what point is a job ‘a job’ do you suppose? When it’s hard work? When it contributes to society? Speaking as someone who has edited all the videos for and managed a Let’s Play channel for a year and a half, putting literally hundreds of hours of work into learning the software from scratch, working hard to make it good and forever endeavouring to actually catch someone’s attention and hold it, I can tell you this is not easy. And I’m not even doing this as a job! A lot of the big names now where just starting out when the climate much more poised against the idea of Let’s Plays being a remotely good idea as a way to make living. These were the people that did it simply for the passion (which I also do, otherwise I wouldn’t bother with it at all).

The idea that Let’s Players are parasites? Lecherous cretins that try to catch the falling crumbs from the cake that is the games they play for a living? Total poppycock. Many developers recognise that Let’s Players have far closer to a symbiotic relationship with them, a mutual back-scratching bonanza. Everyone wins in this scenario.

Of course this is without drawing the comparison between Let’s Players and athletes. It takes a lot of hard work, natural talent and a little bit of luck to be good at both. If Let’s Players are the Sportsmen and women, the video games are the ball and goal posts, Youtube is the pitch and the video viewers are the crowd in the stand. Plus the really really good ones make quite a bit of money, whether that’s fair or not is a debate for another day.

These people are entertainers. Commentators. Comedians. Reviewers. People that make their living from contributing content to an advertising platform behemoth that millions watch every day. Not unlike television which has long since entered and become accepted into the cultural lexicon, just as Let’s Playing will become as the generation that watches it more than or as much a TV grows up and knows it as the norm. And is there anything wrong in that?

Leave a comment

Posted by on February 22, 2015 in Gaming, Youtube


Tags: , , , , , ,

Agnostics/bisexuals are not just fence sitters

Agnostics/bisexuals are not just fence sitters

Wow, I never thought I’d be writing about religion on here. Mad times. But yes, this is in response to the popular sentiment I have heard aimed at agnostics and similarly bisexual people in parts of the homosexual community. Many accuse such people as being fence sitters. I’ve known people to share this sentiment close to me but this is not aimed at you, this is aimed at the people who have a legitimate problem with it.

Now let me clarify, I appreciate by the definition of the term ‘fence sitter’ you are someone who is between both sides. However the phrase comes with a negative connotation. An implied hostility. The idea that you sit precariously on the fence waiting to fall either side onto one of the the ‘real’ choices. The idea that you are apathetic, or lazy or lack the conviction to ‘pick a side’. This is an assertion I whole heartedly disagree with and challenge as it implies that being agnostic or bisexual is not a real choice and that people are inevitably due to fall on one side or the other.

Let’s start with the agnostic one. If religion were a court case, it’d be thrown out for being entirely based on eyewitness testimony and books written by people that may not have even existed at all. However you cannot possibly disprove the many many people who believe that they have had an encounter with the divine in some way shape or form. There is no comprehensive proof either way. Faith in a higher power, something held closely in the hearts of billions of people across the globe, how can I possibly prove that all of those people are holding onto some fairy tale? I can’t.

Being an agnostic to some would seem like a lazy illegitimate choice, but I assure you it isn’t, at least in my case. And I believe in a fair few cases on top of mine. You see I know for a fact that there are people who will grow up religious and spend their whole lives never questioning their beliefs or the legitimacy of a such a pivotal part of their mind that will play an important role in many of their decisions and opinions. Equally are brought up in an atheistic home and brought up to denounce religion and look no further than “I can’t see a God, so he’s definitely not real”. This is not an attack on those who are theists or atheists. This is an attack on ignorance and never scrutinising and analysing your own belief system or lack there of. Other people are on the other side of debate. Why not be open minded and see why that is? If you’re confident in your beliefs or lack there of, you should have no issue at looking at the other side.

Being open minded means you always acknowledge that you may be wrong. And so you seek out both sides of the argument to such an extent you feel you can make an informed decision that feels right to you.

Now for the bisexual one. This first came to my attention when my bisexual brother had gone to a gay bar of some description and told me about a minority of people there who were dismissive of the idea of bisexuality because they’re ‘just being greedy’ or ‘still in a phase’. There is also a misconception that someone who is bisexual is very promiscuous, which isn’t necessarily true, it depends on that individual person. Promiscuity is not a trait exclusive to one sexual orientation and you’re an idiot if you think there are no straight people who have lots of sex with lots of partners (not that I even think that’s a bad thing). My curiosity was piqued and I found that this is something that legitimately exists, at least from a loud minority.

Drawn from a point of sense of pomposity, many of these people believe that this is merely a transitional that happens to many ‘confused’ members of the gay community who later find themselves to be only interested in their own gender. This leads to an outright deprivation of recognition of the sexual orientation of bisexual from some and is a straight up shitty thing to do. Being members of the gay community, surely you would know better than most how it feels for people to tell you that you do not truly think what you think and that these other people purport to have a stronger jurisdiction over your mind than you do? Again, a bit of a harsh thing to do. And again, it’s drawn from a level of ignorance to someone else’s perspective.

Leave a comment

Posted by on February 12, 2015 in Political, Religion


Tags: , , ,

Fallout 4 on the horizon?

Fallout 4 on the horizon?

The answer to that question? Maybe. Bethesda have just announced their first ever E3 showcase for June this year. For a dedicated Fallout fan like myself, this is obviously exciting, being that I will jump on even the slightest flash of news or rumour of a new game as a reason to be legitimately very hyped. I do try to reign in my hype, but it’s been 5 years since New Vegas and 7 years since the last in house made Fallout game.

Now I’m not blind to the latest dick moves of many big name game developers in recent times and there is a possibility, however small, that Bethesda may somehow trash this game. But looking at their track record, I think they can be ruled out of that particular group. Also considering that their development cycle may span up to 4 years now, being that the first rumours of work beginning on the next Fallout began as soon as Skyrim was released. It is also entirely possible my own personal hype (or equally yours dear reader) may actually exceed the quality of the product we may find ourselves looking at. This didn’t actually happen for Skyrim for me, to my personal shock. And I was seriously hyped for that game. It actually managed to be better than its hype, at least for me. So yes. Keep your hype in check all. They may not release use this press event to announce Fallout 4 at all.

That in mind, to any fellow Fallout fans, this is set to make bigger waves in the community than the Survivor ordeal a few years back which led to that internet petition. I was sceptical then. And I’m still marginally sceptical now. But at least this is actually a massive hint being dropped by Bethesda. Keeping in mind that they’re still intent on supporting Elder Scrolls Online, which they published and also have their hands on the Doom franchise which I’m told is long overdue a sequel. You never know. Keep an open mind. And if you’d like some proof of this and are too lazy to check out the Bethesda site … boom.

P.S: I may do another blog at a future point with my personal wishlist for the next game, I’m unsure as of yet, in case you’re interested

1 Comment

Posted by on February 10, 2015 in Gaming


Tags: , , , ,

More like Ninten-DOH!

More like Ninten-DOH!

Well following that sick burn I think it’s about time we launch into this issue as the world is clearly eagerly awaiting my input on the topic.

For the unaware, a fair few people create Youtube videos. They are known as Youtubers. They make money from this and make content creation their full-time job if their channel is big enough to support them, if not, it’s part time as a hobby or whatever. How do they make the money? You can choose to ‘monetise’ a video you have uploaded which puts adverts on said video, thus raising money through the fact that viewers see an advert before their viewing. Got it? Cool.

Now with an ordinary video, about 40% of the money goes to Google (owners of Youtube) for server maintenance, paying of employees, the facilitating of the opportunity to make this money and just general Google shenanigans. The remaining 60% goes to the content creator. The Youtuber you just watched. Nintendo have previously not allowed monetising of their games whatsoever on Youtube, which is their right, with the 60% we just mentioned all going to Nintendo should you even try. But recently, Nintendo have announced their “Partner Programme” meaning Nintendo would split that 60% with the content creator, taking approximately 18% for themselves and leaving 42% for the content creator. No other company takes a portion of the monetisation of Youtubers, Nintendo are the only ones.

Why? Financially they are not in the best situation, although they did just have an outstanding year with the release of several critically acclaimed games and their reputation among the gaming community soaring as one of the only big guys who make consistent quality games. Another motivation is an apparent lack of understanding of the Western market on Nintendo’s part. A massive Youtuber having a good time on a game is a proven way to raise game sales. Youtubers are free advertising for games. Youtube personalities will have the trust of many of their subscribers and their approval can go much further than an advertisement directly from whatever company it is. I myself have bought several games after seeing a few of my favourite personalities having a great time with them and thinking it is my sort of game. And I’ve always been thrilled with those purchases because I knew exactly what I was getting.

Who remembers Minecraft? Bloody everyone who wasn’t living under a rock. It’s now one of the most popular games to have ever been. Why? Did you ever see a minecraft billboard advert? A television commercial for it? I certainly didn’t. Back in early 2011 I saw Seananners play it, binge watched his series on it and got the game for myself the next week. If your game is good enough, a Youtube Let’s Play of it will sell it to an audience. Nintendo has nothing to fear, their games are widely received has good, a Youtube presence from the big names will boost their sales no end.

Of course, as long as you hold Youtubers back and give people a reason to be wary of Let’s Playing your games, they won’t do it. They’ll go elsewhere with all the great games that don’t bite into their revenue. It’s the same principle for raising Corporation Tax highly in the political world. If you do it, businesses will not operate in your country, jobs will be lost and you don’t make any tax revenue at all.

And this is all without bearing in mind that every Nintendo video you intend to monetise needs to be sent to Nintendo for ‘approval’ first. This essentially means that you can’t talk shit about Nintendo because they’ll just take all the money. Suppression of criticism like this is … needless to say a little creepy. I imagine few will take this deal. This reminds me of the controversy around Shadow of Mordor’s review copies that you weren’t allowed to saying anything bad about the game with but the game in itself was actually pretty good.

Nintendo have for whatever mad reason set themselves up as the bad guys for a puny amount of ad revenue to help catch some of the wind from the new media in their sails. Unfortunately this ships sails are made of lead and if anything are just going to slow the ship down.

Leave a comment

Posted by on February 3, 2015 in Gaming, Youtube


Tags: , , , , , , ,